<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Choose between Exploratory and Scripted Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.testingexcellence.com/how-to-choose-between-exploratory-and-scripted-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/how-to-choose-between-exploratory-and-scripted-testing/</link>
	<description>Software Testing Materials on Testing Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/how-to-choose-between-exploratory-and-scripted-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testingexcellence.com/?p=2068#comment-153</guid>
		<description>This appears to be a verbatim copy of an article listed recently on stickyminds and noted there as &quot;first published in 2003&quot;.  The &quot;Read the rest of the article&quot; link points to the stickyminds site, but without the comments.  I fear that the combination of the date (14 Nov 2009) and the link to the original stickyminds article without the comments may mislead readers into thinking this is a recently written article.  

Hopefully, they will note the &quot;originally published February 25, 2003&quot; in the stickyminds article.

Would consider either linking to the stickyminds article with the comments, or updating your posting to show the original article was posted over 6 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to be a verbatim copy of an article listed recently on stickyminds and noted there as &#8220;first published in 2003&#8243;.  The &#8220;Read the rest of the article&#8221; link points to the stickyminds site, but without the comments.  I fear that the combination of the date (14 Nov 2009) and the link to the original stickyminds article without the comments may mislead readers into thinking this is a recently written article.  </p>
<p>Hopefully, they will note the &#8220;originally published February 25, 2003&#8243; in the stickyminds article.</p>
<p>Would consider either linking to the stickyminds article with the comments, or updating your posting to show the original article was posted over 6 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

