<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Women Better Testers than Men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.testingexcellence.com/are-women-better-testers-than-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/are-women-better-testers-than-men/</link>
	<description>Software Testing Materials on Testing Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SURAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/are-women-better-testers-than-men/comment-page-1/#comment-10953</link>
		<dc:creator>SURAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testingexcellence.com/?p=2431#comment-10953</guid>
		<description>I completely disagree regarding the above statement.Its all about how focussed an individual is on his/her project.Its all about tracking and identifying things  which needs a lot of understanding skills, concentration and the depth of how far a tester can think like an end user.The more the concentration the more the bugs hence proving a potential of an able tester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely disagree regarding the above statement.Its all about how focussed an individual is on his/her project.Its all about tracking and identifying things  which needs a lot of understanding skills, concentration and the depth of how far a tester can think like an end user.The more the concentration the more the bugs hence proving a potential of an able tester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanna Kaukinen</title>
		<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/are-women-better-testers-than-men/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanna Kaukinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 11:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testingexcellence.com/?p=2431#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I think you see what I think is wrong with this question when I change it a little bit: Are black people better testers than white people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you see what I think is wrong with this question when I change it a little bit: Are black people better testers than white people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanna Kaukinen</title>
		<link>http://www.testingexcellence.com/are-women-better-testers-than-men/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanna Kaukinen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 10:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.testingexcellence.com/?p=2431#comment-288</guid>
		<description>I disagree, because the skillset is similar in understanding systems structure in both building a program and taking it apart. Most likely your tester is more gifted in understanding systems than you expect her to be and this leads you to look for some other answer.

Did you consider that being able to notice subtle differences is also what keeps you alive in a forest full of all kinds of dangers?

It also probably helps your testers to think OOTB because they don&#039;t know in detail how you&#039;ve built the program. You do, and you cannot help but expect it to work the way you intended it to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, because the skillset is similar in understanding systems structure in both building a program and taking it apart. Most likely your tester is more gifted in understanding systems than you expect her to be and this leads you to look for some other answer.</p>
<p>Did you consider that being able to notice subtle differences is also what keeps you alive in a forest full of all kinds of dangers?</p>
<p>It also probably helps your testers to think OOTB because they don&#8217;t know in detail how you&#8217;ve built the program. You do, and you cannot help but expect it to work the way you intended it to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

